Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.870
Filtrar
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1271028, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38645448

RESUMEN

Background: The war that started on November 4, 2020, in the Tigray region of Northern Ethiopia severely affected the health sector. However, there is no available evidence to suggest the economic damage caused to the public health system because of war-related looting or vandalism. This study was aimed at estimating the cost of war-related looting or vandalism in Tigray's public health system in Northern Ethiopia in 2021. Methods: A provider perspective, a mixed costing method, a retrospective cross-sectional approach, a 50% inflation rate, and a 50 Ethiopian birr equivalent to one United States dollar ($) for the money value were used. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel, taking into consideration the Sendai framework indicators. Results: The total economic cost of the war-related looting or vandalism in monetary terms was more than $3.78 billion, and the damage to the economic value in monetary terms was more than $2.31 billion. Meanwhile, the direct economic loss to the health system in monetary terms was more than $511 million. According to this assessment, 514 (80.6%) health posts, 153 (73.6%) health centers, 16 (80%) primary hospitals, 10 (83.3%) general hospitals, and 2 (100%) specialized hospitals were damaged and/or vandalized either fully or partially due to the war. Conclusion: This war seriously affected the public health sector in the Tigray region. The Federal Government of Ethiopia, the Ministry of Health of Ethiopia, the Tigrayan Government, the Tigray Regional Health Bureau, and the international community must make efforts to find resources for the revitalization of the damaged, plundered, and vandalized healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Salud Pública , Etiopía , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salud Pública/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Guerra
5.
Nature ; 611(7935): 332-345, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36329272

RESUMEN

Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic1,2. Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches1, while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach2 that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities3 in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Técnica Delfos , Cooperación Internacional , Salud Pública , Humanos , COVID-19/economía , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Gobierno , Pandemias/economía , Pandemias/prevención & control , Salud Pública/economía , Salud Pública/métodos , Organizaciones , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Comunicación , Educación en Salud , Política de Salud , Opinión Pública
7.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0261759, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061722

RESUMEN

In the beginning of the COVID-19 US epidemic in March 2020, sweeping lockdowns and other aggressive measures were put in place and retained in many states until end of August of 2020; the ensuing economic downturn has led many to question the wisdom of the early COVID-19 policy measures in the US. This study's objective was to evaluate the cost and benefit of the US COVID-19-mitigating policy intervention during the first six month of the pandemic in terms of COVID-19 mortality potentially averted, versus mortality potentially attributable to the economic downturn. We conducted a synthesis-based retrospective cost-benefit analysis of the full complex of US federal, state, and local COVID-19-mitigating measures, including lockdowns and all other COVID-19-mitigating measures, against the counterfactual scenario involving no public health intervention. We derived parameter estimates from a rapid review and synthesis of recent epidemiologic studies and economic literature on regulation-attributable mortality. According to our estimates, the policy intervention saved 866,350-1,711,150 lives (4,886,214-9,650,886 quality-adjusted life-years), while mortality attributable to the economic downturn was 57,922-245,055 lives (2,093,811-8,858,444 life-years). We conclude that the number of lives saved by the spring-summer lockdowns and other COVID-19-mitigation was greater than the number of lives potentially lost due to the economic downturn. However, the net impact on quality-adjusted life expectancy is ambiguous.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Estadísticos , Salud Pública/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Cuarentena/economía , COVID-19/economía , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Humanos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Cuarentena/ética , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Lancet Public Health ; 7(2): e169-e176, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710359

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-exclusive voluntary licensing that is access-oriented has been suggested as an option to increase access to medicines to address the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, there has been little research on the effect of licensing, mainly focused on economic and supply chain considerations, and not on the benefits in terms of health outcomes. We aimed to study the economic and health effect of voluntary licensing for medicines for HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: A robust modelling framework was created to examine the difference between scenarios, with (factual) and without (counterfactual) a Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) licence for two medicines, dolutegravir and daclatasvir. Data were obtained from MPP licensees, as well as a large number of external sources. The primary outcomes were the cost savings and health impact between scenarios with and without MPP licences across all LMICs. Through its licences, MPP had access to the volumes and prices of licensed generic products sold in all covered countries on a quarterly basis. These data informed the volumes, prices, and uptake for the past factual scenarios and were the basis for modelling the future factual scenarios. These scenarios were then compared with a set of counterfactual scenarios in the absence of the studied licences. FINDINGS: Cumulatively, between 2017 and 2032, the model's central assumptions predicted an additional uptake of 15·494 (range 14·406-15·494) million patient-years of dolutegravir-based HIV treatments, 151 839 (34 575-312 973) deaths averted, and US$3·074 (1·837-5·617) billion saved through the MPP licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. For daclatasvir-based HCV treatments, the cumulative effect from 2015 to 2026 was predicted to be an additional uptake of 428 244 (127 584-636 270) patients treated with daclatasvir, 4070 (225-6323) deaths averted, and $107·593 (30·377-121·284) million saved with the licence compared with the counterfactual scenario. INTERPRETATION: The chain of effects linking upstream licensing to downstream outcomes can be modelled. Accordingly, credible quantitative estimates of economic and health effects arising from access-oriented voluntary licensing were obtained based on assumptions that early generic competition leads to price reductions that influence procurement decisions and enable the faster and broader uptake of recommended medicines, with beneficial economic and health effects. FUNDING: Unitaid.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Países en Desarrollo , Propiedad Intelectual , Concesión de Licencias/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Salud Pública/economía , SARS-CoV-2 , Competencia Económica , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
11.
Leuk Res ; 112: 106748, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34798569

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is increasingly appreciated that some patients with cancer will experience financial burden due to their disease but little is known specifically about patients with haematological malignancies. Therefore, this study aimed to measure financial toxicity experienced by patients with haematological malignancies in the context of a publicly funded health care system. METHOD: All current patients diagnosed with leukaemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma, from two major metropolitan health services in Melbourne, Australia were invited to complete a survey capturing; patient demographics, employment status, income sources, financial coping and insurances, OOP expenses and self-reported financial toxicity using a validated measure. RESULTS: Of the 240 people approached, 113 (47 %) participated and most had leukaemia (62 %). Forty-seven (42 %) participants experienced some degree of financial toxicity using the Comprehensive Score for financial toxicity (COST) instrument. On multivariate linear regression, older age (>65 years, p = 0.007), higher monthly income (>$8000, p = 0.008), not having and being forced into unemployment or early retirement (p < 0.001) remained significantly associated with less financial toxicity. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is present in Australian haematology patients and those at higher risk may be patients of working age, those without private health insurance and patients that have been forced to retire early or have become unemployed due to their diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Atención a la Salud/economía , Estrés Financiero/economía , Neoplasias Hematológicas/economía , Salud Pública/economía , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estrés Financiero/psicología , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Leucemia/diagnóstico , Leucemia/economía , Leucemia/terapia , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/economía , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/economía , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Salud Pública/métodos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
12.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260632, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34874981

RESUMEN

Strategies adopted globally to mitigate the threat of COVID-19 have primarily involved lockdown measures with substantial economic and social costs with varying degrees of success. Morbidity patterns of COVID-19 variants have a strong association with age, while restrictive lockdown measures have association with negative mental health outcomes in some age groups. Reduced economic prospects may also afflict some age cohorts more than others. Motivated by this, we propose a model to describe COVID-19 community spread incorporating the role of age-specific social interactions. Through a flexible parameterisation of an age-structured deterministic Susceptible Exposed Infectious Removed (SEIR) model, we provide a means for characterising different forms of lockdown which may impact specific age groups differently. Social interactions are represented through age group to age group contact matrices, which can be trained using available data and are thus locally adapted. This framework is easy to interpret and suitable for describing counterfactual scenarios, which could assist policy makers with regard to minimising morbidity balanced with the costs of prospective suppression strategies. Our work originates from an Irish context and we use disease monitoring data from February 29th 2020 to January 31st 2021 gathered by Irish governmental agencies. We demonstrate how Irish lockdown scenarios can be constructed using the proposed model formulation and show results of retrospective fitting to incidence rates and forward planning with relevant "what if / instead of" lockdown counterfactuals. Uncertainty quantification for the predictive approaches is described. Our formulation is agnostic to a specific locale, in that lockdown strategies in other regions can be straightforwardly encoded using this model.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Salud Pública/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/virología , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Irlanda/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto Joven
13.
N Z Med J ; 134(1545): 36-46, 2021 11 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34788270

RESUMEN

AIM: This study aims to estimate the mean costs of breast cancer in New Zealand's public health system. METHOD: This study included women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2018 who received services in public hospitals. These patients were identified from the National Breast Cancer Register or the New Zealand Cancer Registry and linked with the Pharmaceutical Collection, National Minimum Dataset, National Non-Admitted Patient Collection and Mortality Collection. RESULTS: 22,948 breast cancer patients were included. The mean public health cost of breast cancer was NZ$44,954 per patient for the period of three months preceding and five years following cancer diagnosis, with the treatment phase accounting for 70% of the cost and the follow-up phase accounting for the remaining 30%. During the treatment phase, surgery costs accounted for the biggest proportion (35%) of the total cost, followed by immunotherapy costs (18%), radiotherapy costs (17%) and costs of diagnostic test, scan and biopsy (16%). The costs decreased substantially with age, from $69,121 for women younger than 45 years old to $23,805 for those aged 80 or over. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of breast cancer in New Zealand's public health system are substantial and have been increasing. However, outcomes of breast cancer have been improving. The results of this study can be used as a baseline of actual costs for comparing the costs of introducing new diagnosis and treatment modalities in the future.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Salud Pública/economía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda
19.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 105(5): 1137-1140, 2021 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34464328

RESUMEN

A country's preparedness for a prompt and successful implementation of vaccination programs plays a pivotal role in disease control and prevention. As it stands now, Afghanistan seems to be ill-prepared to embrace a successful implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination program because of a spate of challenges. These include, but are not limited to, the insufficient number of vaccinators, a dearth of fully integrated functioning cold chain, challenging geographical barriers, cultural issues, insecurity, and protracted conflict. The COVID-19 infodemic along with vaccine mistrust in the country will lead to a pervasive public vaccine hesitancy in Afghanistan, which will present serious obstacles to the COVID-19 immunization efforts. The politicization of the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) and the complaints of embezzlement and misuse of the pandemic aid have already eroded public trust during the pandemic. To ensure a large-scale and equitable distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, the cold chain infrastructure should be strengthened, and the immunization personnel trained. Antivaccination propaganda and misinformation should be tackled with effective communication approaches and effective community engagement, which consider culturally relevant messages appropriate to the culture and people. The allegations of corruption should be addressed to revive public trust in public health interventions, including COVID-19 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Programas de Inmunización , Salud Pública/métodos , Afganistán/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/economía , Comunicación , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/métodos , Programas de Inmunización/normas , Salud Pública/economía , Salud Pública/normas , Confianza , Vacunación , Vacilación a la Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...